Numerous experimental studies indicate that people tend to reciprocate favors and punish unfair behavior. It is hypothesized that these behavioral responses contribute to the enforcement of contracts and, hence, increase gains from trade. It turns out that if only one side of the market has opportunities for reciprocal responses, the impact of reciprocity on contract enforcement depends on the details of the pecuniary incentive system. If both sides of the market have opportunities for reciprocal responses, robust and powerful reciprocity effects occur. In particular, reciprocal behavior causes a substantial increase in the set of enforceable actions and, hence, large efficiency gains.
MLA
Fehr, Ernst, et al. “Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence.” Econometrica, vol. 65, .no 4, Econometric Society, 1997, pp. 833-860, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2171941
Chicago
Fehr, Ernst, Georg Kirchsteiger, and Simon Gachter. “Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence.” Econometrica, 65, .no 4, (Econometric Society: 1997), 833-860. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2171941
APA
Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., & Gachter, S. (1997). Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence. Econometrica, 65(4), 833-860. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2171941
The Executive Committee of the Econometric Society has approved an increase in the submission fees for papers in Econometrica. Starting January 1, 2025, the fee for new submissions to Econometrica will be US$125 for regular members and US$50 for student members.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.