Miguel Costa‐Gomes, Vincent P. Crawford, Bruno Broseta
This paper reports experiments designed to study , the extent to which behavior in games reflects attempts to predict others’ decisions, taking their incentives into account. We study subjects’ initial responses to normal‐form games with various patterns of iterated dominance and unique pure‐strategy equilibria without dominance, using a computer interface that allowed them to search for hidden payoff information, while recording their searches. Monitoring subjects’ information searches along with their decisions allows us to better understand how their decisions are determined, and subjects’ deviations from the search patterns suggested by equilibrium analysis help to predict their deviations from equilibrium decisions.
MLA
Costa‐Gomes, Miguel, et al. “Cognition and Behavior in Normal‐Form Games: An Experimental Study.” Econometrica, vol. 69, .no 5, Econometric Society, 2001, pp. 1193-1235, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00239
Chicago
Costa‐Gomes, Miguel, Vincent P. Crawford, and Bruno Broseta. “Cognition and Behavior in Normal‐Form Games: An Experimental Study.” Econometrica, 69, .no 5, (Econometric Society: 2001), 1193-1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00239
APA
Costa‐Gomes, M., Crawford, V. P., & Broseta, B. (2001). Cognition and Behavior in Normal‐Form Games: An Experimental Study. Econometrica, 69(5), 1193-1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00239
The Executive Committee of the Econometric Society has approved an increase in the submission fees for papers in Econometrica. Starting January 1, 2025, the fee for new submissions to Econometrica will be US$125 for regular members and US$50 for student members.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.