In many trading environments, any incentive compatible and individually rational market mechanism will be either inefficient or will run a deficit. We prove that as the market size gets large, for any fixed surplus (or deficit) , times the minimal absolute inefficiency converges to () where () is essentially a quadratic function of textitx. We introduce a new mechanism, the double auction with a fixed transaction fee. By choosing the size of the fee appropriately, any level of deficit or surplus can be implemented and the resulting mechanisms achieve the above bound.
MLA
Tatur, Tymon. “On the Trade off Between Deficit and Inefficiency and the Double Auction with a Fixed Transaction Fee.” Econometrica, vol. 73, .no 2, Econometric Society, 2005, pp. 517-570, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00587.x
Chicago
Tatur, Tymon. “On the Trade off Between Deficit and Inefficiency and the Double Auction with a Fixed Transaction Fee.” Econometrica, 73, .no 2, (Econometric Society: 2005), 517-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00587.x
APA
Tatur, T. (2005). On the Trade off Between Deficit and Inefficiency and the Double Auction with a Fixed Transaction Fee. Econometrica, 73(2), 517-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00587.x
The Executive Committee of the Econometric Society has approved an increase in the submission fees for papers in Econometrica. Starting January 1, 2025, the fee for new submissions to Econometrica will be US$125 for regular members and US$50 for student members.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.