This paper develops a uniformly valid and asymptotically nonconservative test based on projection for a class of shape restrictions. The key insight we exploit is that these restrictions form convex cones, a simple and yet elegant structure that has been barely harnessed in the literature. Based on a monotonicity property afforded by such a geometric structure, we construct a bootstrap procedure that, unlike many studies in nonstandard settings, dispenses with estimation of local parameter spaces, and the critical values are obtained in a way as simple as computing the test statistic. Moreover, by appealing to strong approximations, our framework accommodates nonparametric regression models as well as distributional/density‐related and structural settings. Since the test entails a tuning parameter (due to the nonstandard nature of the problem), we propose a data‐driven choice and prove its validity. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that our test works well.
MLA
Fang, Zheng, and Juwon Seo. “A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions that Form Convex Cones.” Econometrica, vol. 89, .no 5, Econometric Society, 2021, pp. 2439-2458, https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17764
Chicago
Fang, Zheng, and Juwon Seo. “A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions that Form Convex Cones.” Econometrica, 89, .no 5, (Econometric Society: 2021), 2439-2458. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17764
APA
Fang, Z., & Seo, J. (2021). A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions that Form Convex Cones. Econometrica, 89(5), 2439-2458. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17764
Supplement to "A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions that Form Convex Cones"
This supplement is organized as follows. Appendix B discusses particular shape restrictions with the convex cone property, Appendix C specializes our test to the regular case where rn{ˆθ_n − θ0} converges, Appendix D collects additional proofs and auxiliary results, and Appendix E presents additional simulation studies and an empirical application. Appendix F verifies the main assumptions for our examples, Appendix G provides proofs for Appendix C, while Appendix H contains simulation results omitted from the main text and Appendix E, all of which are relegated to the arXiv version of this paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.07689) due to space limitation.
The Executive Committee of the Econometric Society has approved an increase in the submission fees for papers in Econometrica. Starting January 1, 2025, the fee for new submissions to Econometrica will be US$125 for regular members and US$50 for student members.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.