A number of studies, most notably Crémer and McLean (1985, 1988), have shown that in generic type spaces that admit a common prior and are of a fixed finite size, an uninformed seller can design mechanisms that extract all the surplus from privately informed bidders. We show that this result hinges on the nonconvexity of such a family of priors. When the ambient family of priors convex, generic priors do allow for full surplus extraction provided that for at least one prior in this family, players' beliefs about other players' types do not pin down the players' own preferences. In particular, full surplus extraction is generically impossible in finite type spaces with a common prior. Similarly, generic priors on the universal type space do not allow for full surplus extraction.
MLA
Heifetz, Aviad, and Zvika Neeman. “On the Generic (Im)Possibility of Full Surplus Extraction in Mechanism Design.” Econometrica, vol. 74, .no 1, Econometric Society, 2006, pp. 213-233, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00654.x
Chicago
Heifetz, Aviad, and Zvika Neeman. “On the Generic (Im)Possibility of Full Surplus Extraction in Mechanism Design.” Econometrica, 74, .no 1, (Econometric Society: 2006), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00654.x
APA
Heifetz, A., & Neeman, Z. (2006). On the Generic (Im)Possibility of Full Surplus Extraction in Mechanism Design. Econometrica, 74(1), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00654.x
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.