The implications for efficient allocation of parents' inability to force transfers among siblings are explored. When there are differences in abilities of children within families, such transfers may be necessary to achieve a first-best solution. In the absence of such transfers, a tax on earned income and a subsidy to inheritance are useful second-best tools, whereas subsidies to investments in human capital or physical capital are not desirable.
MLA
Razin, Assaf, et al. “Investment in Human and Nonhuman Capital, Transfers Among Siblings, and the Role of Government.” Econometrica, vol. 52, .no 5, Econometric Society, 1984, pp. 1191-1198, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1910995
Chicago
Razin, Assaf, Efraim Sadka, and Marc Nerlove. “Investment in Human and Nonhuman Capital, Transfers Among Siblings, and the Role of Government.” Econometrica, 52, .no 5, (Econometric Society: 1984), 1191-1198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1910995
APA
Razin, A., Sadka, E., & Nerlove, M. (1984). Investment in Human and Nonhuman Capital, Transfers Among Siblings, and the Role of Government. Econometrica, 52(5), 1191-1198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1910995
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.