We study a rich class of noncooperative games that includes models of oligopoly competition, macroeconomic coordination failures, arms races, bank runs, technology adoption and diffusion, R&D competition, pretrial bargaining, coordination in teams, and many others. For all these games, the sets of pure strategy Nash equilibria, correlated equilibria, and rationalizable strategies have identical bounds. Also, for a class of models of dynamic adaptive choice behavior that encompasses both best-response dynamics and Bayesian learning, the players' choices lie eventually within the same bounds. These bounds are shown to vary monotonically with certain exogenous parameters.
MLA
Roberts, John, and Paul Milgrom. “Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities.” Econometrica, vol. 58, .no 6, Econometric Society, 1990, pp. 1255-1277, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2938316
Chicago
Roberts, John, and Paul Milgrom. “Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities.” Econometrica, 58, .no 6, (Econometric Society: 1990), 1255-1277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2938316
APA
Roberts, J., & Milgrom, P. (1990). Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities. Econometrica, 58(6), 1255-1277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2938316
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.