We develop and estimate a model of dynamic interactions in which commitment is limited and contracts are incomplete to explain the patterns of income and consumption growth in village economies of less developed countries. Households can insure each other through both formal contracts and informal agreements, that is, self‐enforcing agreements specifying voluntary transfers. This theoretical setting nests the case of complete markets and the case where only informal agreements are available. We derive a system of nonlinear equations for income and consumption growth. A key prediction of our model is that both variables are affected by lagged consumption as a consequence of the interplay of formal and informal contracting possibilities. In a semiparametric setting, we prove identification, derive testable restrictions, and estimate the model with the use of data from Pakistani villages. Empirical results are consistent with the economic arguments. Incentive constraints due to self‐enforcement bind with positive probability and formal contracts are used to reduce this probability.
MLA
Dubois, Pierre, et al. “Formal and Informal Risk Sharing in LDCs: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Econometrica, vol. 76, .no 4, Econometric Society, 2008, pp. 679-725, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00857.x
Chicago
Dubois, Pierre, Bruno Jullien, and Thierry Magnac. “Formal and Informal Risk Sharing in LDCs: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Econometrica, 76, .no 4, (Econometric Society: 2008), 679-725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00857.x
APA
Dubois, P., Jullien, B., & Magnac, T. (2008). Formal and Informal Risk Sharing in LDCs: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Econometrica, 76(4), 679-725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00857.x
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.