Treating civic preferences as endogenous and government policies and tax capacities as both an influence on and a consequence of their evolution is an important new strand of thinking to which Besley has contributed. I ask: Does his model provide a convincing explanation of the way that civic cultures and the expansion of the state evolved as a matter of historical fact? And I suggest a number of alternative modeling approaches that both would recognize that policy makers take account of the effects of their policy choices on preferences and, consistent with empirical observations, would support equilibria with culturally heterogeneous rather than homogeneous populations.
MLA
Bowles, Samuel. “ A Comment on: “State Capacity, Reciprocity, and the Social Contract” by Timothy Besley.” Econometrica, vol. 88, .no 4, Econometric Society, 2020, pp. 1337-1343, https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18037
Chicago
Bowles, Samuel. “ A Comment on: “State Capacity, Reciprocity, and the Social Contract” by Timothy Besley.” Econometrica, 88, .no 4, (Econometric Society: 2020), 1337-1343. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18037
APA
Bowles, S. (2020). A Comment on: “State Capacity, Reciprocity, and the Social Contract” by Timothy Besley. Econometrica, 88(4), 1337-1343. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18037
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.